¡@
| ¡@ Capitalism Capitalism, economic system in which private individuals and business firms carry on the production and exchange of goods and services through a complex network of prices and markets. Capitalism has certain key characteristics. First, basic production facilities- land and capital- are privately owned. Second, economic activity is organized and coordinated through the interaction of buyers and sellers (or producers) in markets. Third, owners of land and capital as well as the workers they employ are free to pursue their own self-interests in seeking maximum gain from the use of their resources and labor in production. Consumers are free to spend their incomes in ways that they believe will yield the greatest satisfaction. This principle reflects the idea that under capitalism, producers will be forced by competition to use their resources in ways that will best satisfy the wants of consumers. Fourth, a minimum of government supervision is required; if competition is present, economic activity will be self-regulating. Beginnings of
Modern Capitalism The Rise of
Industrialization However, the development of industrial capitalism had serious human costs. The early days of the Industrial Revolution were marred by appalling conditions for large numbers of workers, especially in England. Abusive child labor, long working hours, and dangerous and unhealthy workplaces were common. These conditions led German political philosopher Karl Marx to produce his massive indictment of the capitalistic system, Das Kapital (3 volumes, 1867-1894). Marx's work struck at the fundamental principle of capitalism- private ownership of the means of production. Marx believed that land and capital should be owned by society as a whole and that the products of the system should be distributed according to need. In the late 19th century, especially in the United States, the modern corporation began to emerge as the dominant form of business organization, and capitalism became the dominant economic system. The tendency toward corporate control of manufacturing led to many attempts to create combines, monopolies, or trusts that could control an entire industry. Eventually, the public outcry against such practices was great enough in the United States to lead the Congress of the United States to pass antitrust legislation. This legislation attempted to make the pursuit of monopoly by business illegal, trying to enforce at least a bare minimum of competition in industry and commerce. 20th-Century
Capitalism Smith, Adam
Free-Market
Economy Free-market economies are also criticized. Opponents believe that a free-market economy cannot ensure basic social values, such as alleviating poverty, or that the income distribution that results from a free-market economy may not be equitable. A free-market economy may also permit the accumulation of vast wealth and powerful vested interests that could threaten the survival of political freedom. Economics
History of
Economic Thought The development of modern
nationalism during the 16th century shifted economic attention to increasing the wealth
and power of the various nation-states. The economic policy of the time was known as
mercantilism. Mercantilists valued gold and silver because with these metals a ruler could
hire and outfit mercenaries, thus increasing the country's power. Many European nations
began colonizing other parts of the world and siphoning precious metals and raw materials
from their colonies. As a coherent economic theory, classical economics starts with Smith, continues with British economists Thomas Robert Malthus and David Ricardo, and culminates with British economist John Stuart Mill. Classical economists agreed on several major principles. All believed in private property, free markets, and the benefits of competition. They shared Smith's suspicion of governmental involvement in the economy and his belief that the individual pursuit of private gain increased the public good. From Ricardo, classicists derived the notion of diminishing returns, which held that as more labor and capital were applied to land, a point was reached after which yields steadily diminished. One debate was in regard to population growth. Malthus maintained that human population growth would eventually outstrip food production, leading to famine, war, epidemics, and plague. Mill believed that human population could rationally be limited. He also thought that government could play a role in the economy and favored worker ownership of factories. Mill thus represents a bridge between classical laissez-faire economics and an emerging welfare state. German political philosopher Karl Marx provided the most important opposition to classical economics. Marx's historical studies convinced him that profit and other property income result from force and fraud inflicted by the strong on the weak. Thus, the central social conflict is between capitalists who own the means of production- factories and machines- and workers who possess nothing but their bare hands. Exploitation is measured by the capacity of capitalists to pay no more than subsistence wages to their employees and extract for themselves as profit the difference between these wages and the selling price of market commodities. Marx argued that the internal contradictions within capitalism- its social inequities- would eventually end its existence. According to Marx, the crises
of capitalism would manifest themselves in falling rates of profit, mounting hostility
between workers and employers, and ever more severe depressions. Class warfare would lead
to revolution and progress toward, first, socialism and, ultimately, communism. Once
communism was achieved, the state would wither away, and each individual would be
compensated according to need. During the Great Depression of
the 1930s, accepted strategies for reversing the depression failed, and fresh policies
were urgently required. British economist John Maynard Keynes supplied them. In his work
The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (1936), he asserted that (1) neither
high prices nor high wages explain persistent depression and mass unemployment, and (2)
the explanation of these phenomena should be focused on aggregate demand- that is, the
total spending of consumers, business investors, and governmental bodies. When aggregate
demand is low, sales and jobs suffer; when it is high, all is well and prosperous. These
ideas form the basis of contemporary macroeconomics. The national economy depends not on
the actions of consumers, who are limited in the amounts that they can spend by the size
of their incomes, but on business investors and governments, who invest in the economy. In
a recession or depression, the proper thing to do is either to enlarge private investment
or create public substitutes. This is done through easy credit or low interest rates, or
more drastically by incurring deliberate budget deficits through public projects or
subsidies to afflicted groups. The two major economic systems
are the free-enterprise system and the Communist system. The major differences between
these concern ownership of factories, farms, and other enterprises, and contrasting
principles of pricing and income distribution. In free-enterprise societies, much of the
gross national product (GNP) is directly generated by profit-making business enterprises,
farmers, and private institutions. Prices are determined by markets, and income is not
firmly established. In Communist economies, the state plans much of the price setting, and
there is public ownership of factories, farms, and large retail establishments. However,
all organized economic systems mix market activity and government intervention to some
degree. Free Trade
The argument for free trade is in great part based on the ideas of 18th-century British economist Adam Smith, who asserted that each country should specialize in the production and export of goods in which it has an absolute advantage- that is, the goods that it can produce more cheaply than any of its trading partners. Another British economist, David Ricardo, extended that analysis to encompass the more general case of comparative advantage. Ricardo noted that even the nations that lack an absolute advantage in production of any commodity can gain from free trade if they concentrate on producing commodities in which they have the smallest disadvantage. This enables the nation to trade goods that are easiest to produce for goods that are more difficult to produce. When nations practice the principle of comparative advantage, more goods are produced between the trading countries, and the wealth of both countries increases. However, few countries have ever actually adopted a policy of free trade. One of the oldest arguments for protectionist policies is the so-called infant-industry argument. According to this theory, when foreign competition is reduced or eliminated by import barriers, domestic industries can develop rapidly. After their development is complete, they should be able to hold their own in competition with industries of other nations, and protection should no longer be required. In practice, however, protection frequently cannot be removed, because the domestic industries never develop sufficient competitive strength. Another argument for protection is the national defense argument, which seeks to avoid dependence on foreign sources for supplies of essential materials or finished products that might be denied in time of war. When economies are booming and jobs seem secure, most people tend to support free trade. When recessions occur, many nations become more protectionist because of national interest and pressure from interest groups that are adversely affected by prolonged recessions. Since World War II ended in 1945, the leading trading nations have generally made a concerted effort to promote freer trade and to remove protection barriers. In 1948 the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) went into effect. GATT was a treaty and international trade organization that worked to reduce or eliminate tariffs and other barriers to trade. Membership in GATT increased steadily until 1995, when its activities were taken over by the World Trade Organization (WTO), an international organization that promotes free trade. Laissez-Faire
Asia-Pacific
Economic Cooperation Foreign ministers and trade officials from each country have met yearly since APEC's inception. The heads of state met for the first time in 1993, while trade officials began annual meetings in 1994. At these meetings, members have discussed such issues as regional security, financing for infrastructure development, reduction of tariffs and other trade barriers, and development of global free trade. In 1994 APEC members with industrialized economies pledged to eliminate trade barriers by 2010, while those with developing economies agreed to follow by 2020. To promote global free trade, members were encouraged to reduce trade barriers to non-APEC nations as well. No legally binding agreement was signed. The group has also agreed to strive to standardize customs and international trade documentation. The APEC secretariat, the organization's small administrative office, was established in 1992 in Singapore. |