| ¡@ Capitalism
Capitalism, economic system in
which private individuals and business firms carry on the production and exchange of goods
and services through a complex network of prices and markets. Capitalism has certain key
characteristics. First, basic production facilities- land and capital- are privately
owned. Second, economic activity is organized and coordinated through the interaction of
buyers and sellers (or producers) in markets. Third, owners of land and capital as well as
the workers they employ are free to pursue their own self-interests in seeking maximum
gain from the use of their resources and labor in production. Consumers are free to spend
their incomes in ways that they believe will yield the greatest satisfaction. This
principle reflects the idea that under capitalism, producers will be forced by competition
to use their resources in ways that will best satisfy the wants of consumers. Fourth, a
minimum of government supervision is required; if competition is present, economic
activity will be self-regulating.
Beginnings of
Modern Capitalism
Two 18th-century developments paved the way for the
emergence of modern capitalism. The first was the appearance of the economists called
physiocrats in France after 1750. Physiocracy is the term applied to a school of economic
thought that suggested the existence of a natural order in economics, one that does not
require direction from the state for people to be prosperous. According to the
physiocrats, productive activities such as agriculture, fishing, and mining produce a
surplus or net product. Other activities, such as manufacturing, do not produce new wealth
but simply transform or circulate the output of the productive class.
The second development was the thought of British
philosopher Adam Smith. He also tried to show the existence of an
economic order that would function most efficiently if the state played a limited role,
but unlike the physiocrats he did not believe that industry was unproductive. Rather,
Smith saw in the division of labor and the extension of markets almost limitless
possibilities for society to expand its wealth through manufacture and trade.
The Rise of
Industrialization
The ideas of Smith and the physiocrats provided the
ideological and intellectual background for the Industrial Revolution- the material side
of the sweeping transformations in society and the world that characterized the 19th
century. The industrialization process introduced mechanical power to replace human and
animal power in the production of goods and services. Production became more specialized
and concentrated in larger units, called factories. The application of mechanical power to
production helped increase worker efficiency, which made goods abundant and cheap.
However, the development of
industrial capitalism had serious human costs. The early days of the Industrial Revolution
were marred by appalling conditions for large numbers of workers, especially in England.
Abusive child labor, long working hours, and dangerous and unhealthy workplaces were
common. These conditions led German political philosopher Karl Marx to produce his massive
indictment of the capitalistic system, Das Kapital (3 volumes, 1867-1894). Marx's work
struck at the fundamental principle of capitalism- private ownership of the means of
production. Marx believed that land and capital should be owned by society as a whole and
that the products of the system should be distributed according to need.
In the late 19th century,
especially in the United States, the modern corporation began to emerge as the dominant
form of business organization, and capitalism became the dominant economic system. The
tendency toward corporate control of manufacturing led to many attempts to create
combines, monopolies, or trusts that could control an entire industry. Eventually, the
public outcry against such practices was great enough in the United States to lead the
Congress of the United States to pass antitrust legislation. This legislation attempted to
make the pursuit of monopoly by business illegal, trying to enforce at least a bare
minimum of competition in industry and commerce.
20th-Century
Capitalism
For most of the 20th century, capitalism has been
buffeted by wars, revolution, and economic depressions. However, capitalist systems
demonstrated remarkable abilities for survival and adaptability to change, including the
use of government intervention to soften the impact of boom and bust cycles, periods of
expansion and prosperity followed by economic depression and increased unemployment. World
War I (1914-1918) brought revolution and a Marxist-based Communism to Russia. The war also
spawned the Nazi system in Germany (see National Socialism), a mixture of capitalism and
state socialism, brought together in a regime whose violence and expansionism eventually
pushed the world into another major conflict, World War II (1939-1945). After the war,
Communist economic systems took hold in China and Eastern Europe. The Western capitalist
nations enjoyed economic growth and rising standards of living, although inflation and
unemployment continued to be intermittent problems. As the Cold War came to an end in the
1980s, the former Soviet-bloc nations turned to capitalism (with mixed success at first).
China was the only major power to retain a Marxist regime. Many of the developing nations,
strongly influenced by Marxist ideas in the early postcolonial period, turned to a
modified form of capitalism in their search for answers to economic problems.
Smith, Adam
Smith, Adam (1723-1790), British philosopher and
economist, who conducted the first serious attempt to study the nature of capital and the
historical development of industry and commerce among European nations. He was born in
Kirkcaldy, Scotland. He developed a friendship with Scottish philosopher David Hume that
contributed to his ethical and economic theories.
From 1766 to 1776, he wrote his treatise An Inquiry
into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776). This work represents the first
serious attempt in the history of economic thought to separate the study of political
economy from the related fields of political science, ethics, and jurisprudence. It
includes a penetrating analysis of the processes in which economic wealth is produced and
distributed and demonstrates that the fundamental sources of all income are rent, wages,
and profits. Smith's central thesis is that capital is best used for the production and
distribution of wealth under conditions of governmental noninterference and free trade. To
illustrate this concept of minimum government control in commercial endeavors, Smith
explained the principle of the "invisible hand" in which every individual is
led, as if by an invisible hand, to achieve the best good for all. Therefore any
interference with free competition by government is almost certain to be injurious.
Free-Market
Economy
Free-Market Economy, economic system in which
individuals, rather than government, make the majority of decisions regarding economic
activities and transactions (see Capitalism). In a free-market economy, the government
enters the economy only to provide public goods such as defense, law and order, and
education, and to perform a regulatory role in certain situations.
Proponents of free-market economies believe that they
provide a number of advantages. They see free-market economies as encouraging individual
responsibility for decisions, and they believe that economic freedom is essential to
political freedom. Many people believe that free markets are more efficient in economic
terms because they provide incentives both to individuals to allocate resources, such as
labor and capital, among the most productive uses, and to firms to produce goods and
services that the public wants, using the most efficient means of production.
Free-market economies are also
criticized. Opponents believe that a free-market economy cannot ensure basic social
values, such as alleviating poverty, or that the income distribution that results from a
free-market economy may not be equitable. A free-market economy may also permit the
accumulation of vast wealth and powerful vested interests that could threaten the survival
of political freedom.
Economics
Economics, social science concerned with the
production, distribution, exchange, and consumption of goods and services. Economists
focus on the way in which individuals, groups, business enterprises, and governments
achieve economic objectives efficiently. Economics can be divided into two major fields.
The first, microeconomics, explains how the interplay of supply and demand in competitive
markets creates a multitude of individual prices, wage rates, profit margins, and rental
changes. The second field, macroeconomics, deals with explanations of national income and
employment.
History of
Economic Thought
Economic issues have occupied people's minds since
ancient times. Greek philosophers Aristotle and Plato wrote about problems of wealth,
property, and trade. Both felt that to live by trade was undesirable. The Romans borrowed
their economic ideas from the Greeks and showed the same contempt for trade. During the
Middle Ages (5th century to 15th century), the Roman Catholic church condemned usury (the
taking of interest for money loaned) and regarded commerce as inferior to agriculture.
The development of modern
nationalism during the 16th century shifted economic attention to increasing the wealth
and power of the various nation-states. The economic policy of the time was known as
mercantilism. Mercantilists valued gold and silver because with these metals a ruler could
hire and outfit mercenaries, thus increasing the country's power. Many European nations
began colonizing other parts of the world and siphoning precious metals and raw materials
from their colonies.
A school of thought known as physiocracy arose in
France during the second half of the 18th century. The physiocrats believed that all
wealth originates in agriculture; wealth is then distributed from farmers to other groups.
The physiocrats promoted free trade and laissez-faire. British economist Adam Smith met
the leading physiocrats and developed their doctrines in his writings.
As a coherent economic theory,
classical economics starts with Smith, continues with British economists Thomas Robert
Malthus and David Ricardo, and culminates with British economist John Stuart Mill.
Classical economists agreed on several major principles. All believed in private property,
free markets, and the benefits of competition. They shared Smith's suspicion of
governmental involvement in the economy and his belief that the individual pursuit of
private gain increased the public good. From Ricardo, classicists derived the notion of
diminishing returns, which held that as more labor and capital were applied to land, a
point was reached after which yields steadily diminished.
One debate was in regard to
population growth. Malthus maintained that human population growth would eventually
outstrip food production, leading to famine, war, epidemics, and plague. Mill believed
that human population could rationally be limited. He also thought that government could
play a role in the economy and favored worker ownership of factories. Mill thus represents
a bridge between classical laissez-faire economics and an emerging welfare state.
German political philosopher
Karl Marx provided the most important opposition to classical economics. Marx's historical
studies convinced him that profit and other property income result from force and fraud
inflicted by the strong on the weak. Thus, the central social conflict is between
capitalists who own the means of production- factories and machines- and workers who
possess nothing but their bare hands. Exploitation is measured by the capacity of
capitalists to pay no more than subsistence wages to their employees and extract for
themselves as profit the difference between these wages and the selling price of market
commodities. Marx argued that the internal contradictions within capitalism- its social
inequities- would eventually end its existence.
According to Marx, the crises
of capitalism would manifest themselves in falling rates of profit, mounting hostility
between workers and employers, and ever more severe depressions. Class warfare would lead
to revolution and progress toward, first, socialism and, ultimately, communism. Once
communism was achieved, the state would wither away, and each individual would be
compensated according to need.
Classical economics proceeded from the assumption of
scarcity of resources. Dating from the 1870s, neoclassicist economists shifted emphasis
from limitations on supply to interpretations of consumer choice. Neoclassicists explained
market prices according to the intensity of consumer preference for one more unit of a
commodity. British economist Alfred Marshall explained demand by the principle of marginal
utility, and supply by the rule of marginal productivity (the cost of producing the last
item of a given quantity). In competitive markets, consumer preferences for low prices of
goods and seller preferences for high prices settle on a mutually agreeable level. This
same reconciliation between supply and demand occurs in markets for money and human labor.
For example, in competitive labor markets, actual wages represent to the employer the
value of the output, and to the employee the acceptable compensation for the work.
During the Great Depression of
the 1930s, accepted strategies for reversing the depression failed, and fresh policies
were urgently required. British economist John Maynard Keynes supplied them. In his work
The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (1936), he asserted that (1) neither
high prices nor high wages explain persistent depression and mass unemployment, and (2)
the explanation of these phenomena should be focused on aggregate demand- that is, the
total spending of consumers, business investors, and governmental bodies. When aggregate
demand is low, sales and jobs suffer; when it is high, all is well and prosperous. These
ideas form the basis of contemporary macroeconomics. The national economy depends not on
the actions of consumers, who are limited in the amounts that they can spend by the size
of their incomes, but on business investors and governments, who invest in the economy. In
a recession or depression, the proper thing to do is either to enlarge private investment
or create public substitutes. This is done through easy credit or low interest rates, or
more drastically by incurring deliberate budget deficits through public projects or
subsidies to afflicted groups.
Economic Systems
The two major economic systems
are the free-enterprise system and the Communist system. The major differences between
these concern ownership of factories, farms, and other enterprises, and contrasting
principles of pricing and income distribution. In free-enterprise societies, much of the
gross national product (GNP) is directly generated by profit-making business enterprises,
farmers, and private institutions. Prices are determined by markets, and income is not
firmly established. In Communist economies, the state plans much of the price setting, and
there is public ownership of factories, farms, and large retail establishments. However,
all organized economic systems mix market activity and government intervention to some
degree.
Falling somewhere between societies that emphasize
either central planning or free enterprise are those that formally practice social
democracy, or liberal socialism. For example, Sweden organizes the bulk of productive
activity under private ownership but regulates this activity closely, intervenes to
protect the jobs of workers, and redistributes substantial portions of profits and large
individual incomes to low-income groups.
Free Trade
Free Trade, interchange of commodities across political
frontiers without restrictions such as tariffs, quotas, or foreign exchange controls. This
economic policy contrasts with protectionist policies that use such restrictions to
protect or stimulate domestic industries.
The argument for free trade is
in great part based on the ideas of 18th-century British economist Adam Smith, who
asserted that each country should specialize in the production and export of goods in
which it has an absolute advantage- that is, the goods that it can produce more cheaply
than any of its trading partners. Another British economist, David Ricardo, extended that
analysis to encompass the more general case of comparative advantage. Ricardo noted that
even the nations that lack an absolute advantage in production of any commodity can gain
from free trade if they concentrate on producing commodities in which they have the
smallest disadvantage. This enables the nation to trade goods that are easiest to produce
for goods that are more difficult to produce. When nations practice the principle of
comparative advantage, more goods are produced between the trading countries, and the
wealth of both countries increases.
However, few countries have
ever actually adopted a policy of free trade. One of the oldest arguments for
protectionist policies is the so-called infant-industry argument. According to this
theory, when foreign competition is reduced or eliminated by import barriers, domestic
industries can develop rapidly. After their development is complete, they should be able
to hold their own in competition with industries of other nations, and protection should
no longer be required. In practice, however, protection frequently cannot be removed,
because the domestic industries never develop sufficient competitive strength. Another
argument for protection is the national defense argument, which seeks to avoid dependence
on foreign sources for supplies of essential materials or finished products that might be
denied in time of war.
When economies are booming and
jobs seem secure, most people tend to support free trade. When recessions occur, many
nations become more protectionist because of national interest and pressure from interest
groups that are adversely affected by prolonged recessions. Since World War II ended in
1945, the leading trading nations have generally made a concerted effort to promote freer
trade and to remove protection barriers. In 1948 the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade (GATT) went into effect. GATT was a treaty and international trade organization that
worked to reduce or eliminate tariffs and other barriers to trade. Membership in GATT
increased steadily until 1995, when its activities were taken over by the World Trade
Organization (WTO), an international organization that promotes free trade.
Laissez-Faire
Laissez-Faire, in economics, policy of domestic
nonintervention by government in individual or industrial monetary affairs. The term is
French for "let things alone." The doctrine, which arose in the late 18th
century, favors capitalist self-interest, competition, and natural consumer preferences as
forces leading to optimal prosperity and freedom. The principles of laissez-faire and free
trade appealed strongly to the growing class of capitalists of the Industrial Revolution.
Inevitably, with the tremendous growth of industry, laissez-faire policies led to abuses,
especially in the use of child labor. Gradually, businesses combined to control production
and prices for the benefit of their owners. Thus, competition- a basic tenet of the
laissez-faire system- was eliminated. This trend toward monopolies led to calls for
reform, and government controls were reasserted. Laissez-faire still exists today in the
emphasis placed on the profit motive and on individual initiative in economic progress.
Asia-Pacific
Economic Cooperation
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), organization
of 18 nations, bordering the Pacific Ocean, that is dedicated to promoting regional
economic integration and free trade, as well as global free trade. APEC was founded in
1989 at the prompting of the Australian government. As of 1996, its members included
Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico,
New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand,
and the United States. Together, the APEC members account for more than 50 percent of the
world's economic production.
Foreign ministers and trade officials
from each country have met yearly since APEC's inception. The heads of state met for the
first time in 1993, while trade officials began annual meetings in 1994. At these
meetings, members have discussed such issues as regional security, financing for
infrastructure development, reduction of tariffs and other trade barriers, and development
of global free trade. In 1994 APEC members with industrialized economies pledged to
eliminate trade barriers by 2010, while those with developing economies agreed to follow
by 2020. To promote global free trade, members were encouraged to reduce trade barriers to
non-APEC nations as well. No legally binding agreement was signed. The group has also
agreed to strive to standardize customs and international trade documentation. The APEC
secretariat, the organization's small administrative office, was established in 1992 in
Singapore. |